Co-option After the 2025 Elections: A Democratic Safety Net or a Missed Opportunity?
The ordinary elections held on 1 May 2025 across Northamptonshire’s parish and town councils revealed a persistent challenge in local democracy: insufficient nominations. While many councils successfully filled their seats, a significant number were left with vacancies, prompting a wave of co-options to restore quorum and functionality.
The Numbers Behind the Narrative
A survey conducted by Northants CALC in the weeks following the election gathered responses from just over 100 councils. The data paints a clear picture of the scale and complexity of the issue:
253 vacancies were recorded as of election day at 100 councils.
By 1 July, 139 vacancies had been filled, indicating a proactive approach by many councils.
45 returning councillors were co-opted — individuals who did not stand for election but later put themselves forward for co-option.
The distribution of vacancies varied:
36% of councils reported two vacancies.
23% had three vacancies, and
22% had one vacancy.
A small number of councils reported as many as seven vacancies.
Interestingly, councils that successfully co-opted former councillors were slightly more effective in filling their vacancies. However, 74% of councils reported that none of their co-opted members were returning councillors, suggesting that the pool of willing former members remains limited.
Why Not Stand for Election?
Feedback from councils and councillors suggests several reasons why individuals may shy away from the electoral process but embrace co-option:
Fear of rejection: The public nature of elections can be daunting, especially for first-time candidates.
Complex nomination procedures: Paper-based forms and limited submission points have been described as “anti-democratic” and overly burdensome.
Perceived effort: Standing for election requires time, planning, and visibility—barriers that co-option circumvents.
While contested elections are vital for democratic legitimacy, uncontested seats are often filled by committed individuals who simply prefer a quieter route into public service.
The Co-option Process: Practical and Inclusive
The co-option process is designed to be flexible and inclusive:
Councils may invite expressions of interest but must remain open to candidates appearing on the night.
Voting is conducted by show of hands, requiring an absolute majority.
Candidates are encouraged to read the Good Councillor’s Guide and attend meetings to understand the role.
This flexibility allows councils to respond quickly to vacancies while maintaining transparency and fairness.
Reflections and Recommendations
The 2025 experience underscores the need for:
Simplified nomination processes: An online portal could reduce barriers and encourage more candidates to stand.
Better promotion of candidacy: Councils should actively engage diverse groups and demystify the election process.
Recognition of co-option’s value: While not a substitute for elections, co-option remains a vital tool for maintaining council operations and welcoming new voices.
As councils prepare for future elections, the lessons of 2025 should inform strategies to strengthen participation and uphold democratic standards.